Single Ladies [Put A Utility Belt On It] Part 2: Cassandra Cain

Cassandra Cain as Batgirl (II) by James Jean

In considering Cassandra Cain, a significant deviation needs to be made from how I was able to analyze Barbara Gordon. Babs’ life easily conforms to both the conventions of western literature and to the ideals of (white) western feminism so my task was hardly more difficult than stitching together the most significant events of her life and superimposing them against the framework of conventional femininity. For Cassandra to be properly understood, a complete reinterpretation of her is necessary because of a basic lack of understanding of the difference between sex and gender on the part of her original creators.

What gets focused on both in the text and the fandom at large about Cassandra’s childhood is that she was raised in seclusion by her father- David Cain- without being taught to read, write, or speak; she was only taught to fight and kill. The part that gets overlooks is that Cassandra was never assigned a gender at birth, based on her sex or otherwise. While never recognized or expounded on in the text, Cassandra is what queer, trans*, and intersex circles would refer to as UAAB (Unassigned at Birth) in contrast to either MAAB (Male Assigned At Birth) or FAAB (Female Assigned At Birth). From her birth until she was taken in by Bruce and Babs, Cassandra had no concept of gender and thus no fixed gender identity until she was (unknowingly) coercively assigned female by Bruce when he named her Batgirl.

Which doesn’t close the book on Cassandra’s gender identity because it doesn’t account for her self image, a particularly tricky thing to pick out from the incredibly exaggerated depictions of gender in superhero comics. While there’s little to suggest that Cassandra could be transmasculine as she has never challenged or rejected the assumption that she is female beyond the point that she could be reasonably assumed to understand the concept of gender (as discreet from sex), there’s also just as little to suggest that she does in fact internally identify as female. I’m not entirely ruling out the possibility that Cassandra is transmasculine, but my opinion is that her gender identity is non binary or gender neutral.

One of the biggest clues supporting a non binary or neutral gender identity is her original costume. The tendency to draw her with much bigger and more prominent breasts than is realistic or probable notwithstanding, she immediately removed all of the clues to not just her identity but her gender as well from a costume and a legacy that has in every other iteration firmly and intentionally communicated femininity. Cassandra is the only one of the Batgirls or Batwomen who wore no visible make up while in costume nor hair (real or otherwise) spilling out the back of her cowl. The other is that Cassandra has never presented as femme unless directed or coerced into it by a third party. She appears to have absolutely no interest in influencing what gender people read her as.

Interestingly enough, Cassandra’s androgyny seems to expose the sexism of the batfamily; most notably in how differently Bruce, Tim, and Damian treat her relative to Stephanie. Typically, any criticisms or concerns about Cassandra were voiced in terms of her being dangerous, unpredictable, or uncontrollable while the vast majority of criticism leveled at Stephanie as Spoiler, Robin, and Batgirl have been gendered- especially Tim’s brutal manipulations and Damian’s misogynist tirades.

Unfortunately an accurate analysis and extrapolation of Cassandra’s gender identity cannot  progress far beyond a rough sketch because her primary struggle has been for agency, something that she’s rarely been able to achieve and maintain for long. All things considered, I can’t help but think that despite the fact that Tim Drake was in the role at the time, Cassandra was better suited to be the first regular continuity FAAB Robin than to follow in Babs’ footsteps to become the second Batgirl.

What the continued failure to slow down and explore the nuances of Cassandra’s identity beyond her capacity to kill and value as a living weapon exposes is how blind mainstream writers and much of the readership are to the critical difference between sex and gender. Cassandra having been raised without an assigned gender or exposure to socialized gender norms should not lead the reader to the conclusion that gender is purely a social construction, but rather created the potential to explore gender as a pure, innate expression of self that sits at the core of her character like a black hole.

As it currently stands, I believe that no one can honestly say that we know very much of anything about Cassandra’s self identity based on her published appearances alone which is a very strange and troubling thing to say about a character who held a solo series for over 70 issues. Cassandra stands as a testament to the fact that the dialogue about gender in mainstream superhero comics must extend beyond improving female representation to the recognition that gender is neither predicated on sex nor a binary.

Advertisements

About emmahouxbois

Emma Houxbois is a fiercely queer trans woman from the wilds of Canada, most recently spotted in the Pacific Northwest. She is currently Comics Editor for The Rainbow Hub, a two time IWC Women's World Champion, and has written for the web since 2005 for sites including Playboy, Bitch Media, and Graphic Policy.
This entry was posted in Discussion, Single Ladies. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Single Ladies [Put A Utility Belt On It] Part 2: Cassandra Cain

  1. Sue says:

    This is really interesting. I have a question and a point for comment. When David Cain had Cass commit her first murder as a child he dressed her in clothhin traditionally worn by the “good little girl” – a frilly dress and patent leather shoes. What do you make of that? I always thought part of the reason why Cass presented the way she did later may have been related to how Cain dressed her that day.
    Second, about your point about the hair flowing with other Batgirls and women. The costume that Cass wore was not her own but was designed by Helena Bertinelli during No Man’s Land to create the impression that Batman was still around and, as such, hid her hair. Cass could have changed it, of course, but it’s interesting to note that her peer, Stephanie Brown as Spoiler, also regularly hid her hair so I wonder if that was influence. (Of course Steph didn’t hide her hair when Robin, traditionally a male role, so go figure).

    • I have my own thoughts on your query, when David Cain dressed up Cass, I believed it was more for disguise purposes so the bodyguards would think she was just a harmless little girl. As for Cass not changing her batgirl suit from Helena’s design, Helena originally crafted the mask for practical reasons (so her hair won’t get pulled, to prevent being sprayed in the open holes, etc.), and when Cass took it, she just kind-of flowed with it. The suit worked, so why change it? Also, when she was prevented from wearing the batgirl costume, Cass just threw on some makeup, wore pants and a shirt with a utility belt and ran off while Steph crafted a full blown superhero costume.

      Cassandra strikes me as the type to not really care about her looks (during her run as Batgirl, her civilian clothing looks sloppy, lacked a fashion sense and just thrown on).

      Stephanie as the Spoiler, actually had her long blond hair tied in a pony tail behind her black mask. Her ponytail was only covered when she pulled on her hood, but when she pulled off her hood, you could see her hair. I definitely agree that Cass is gender neutral.

  2. gerardo tejada says:

    All that talk about gender made my head hurt, after all the notion of gender neutral still goes into the concept of gender so the neutrality of It is just an ilusion, or maybe is there to point out how our notions of gender are just ideologies.

    While I think one day cognitive science and neurology will unmask the whole gender issue, I cant dismiss that the whole concept of gender delimits the game of words, gender neutral seems to escape the game of genders so is obviouslly a missguided concept. It will fit the needs of the speech but would remain and absurd.

    I also cant help but remember that the only member of the family that trusted Cassandra as she should be trusted is Tim Drake, who also has a very curious sexual identity as the eternal Virgin. As Stephanie was the “friend” Tim’s cold logic was an interesting mirror he also skiped gender while looking at Cassandra, wether thats good or just Tim growin oblivious to social notions such as gender as he goes deeper into a narcisistic state of control, much like ozmandias in watchmen.

    The most important part of course is how the textual character we interact with was produced, the gender neutrality could be a subproduct of how and why she was written that way, in the comics medium the author has a limited control on the final product.

    The easiest answer and the less interesting is saying her gender has been inhibited by the limits authors had, as Cass can be seen as an unfinished product, she is a very underused and under developed character that lead to many writers writing her as autistic.

    Is all speculation, but we have to deal with a textual beign not an actual person, produced by a media directed at men, with Cass beign created by a man. Further more cassandra has no sex, she doesnt has biology but a mere representation of biology, gender on gender, a mimesis of a mimesis, everything we can learn about sex and gender is a simulation, not the real thing.

    What Cassandra can also teach us is that comunication is flawed as the character identity is always built inside the reader’s mind, Cassandra means nothing and means everything. Her Sex and Gender are nonexistent yet are demanded by both the text and the reader.

    Her gender is her sex, we need to know is she a “she” or a “he”, she is a female and from that asumption her textual sex is born. At the contrary of a real person whose body comes first from the womb, Cassandra is born as Gender, cause she is textual.

    So if she comes as a girl wouldnt the whole Gender Neutral not be applied? Is her defiance of Gender something that came out of representation? Is because the writers didnt know how to handle It? Comes from the reader’s experience?

    This “imperfection” is a perfect way to comprehend our notions of gender as when we read we are forced to deal with a character that doesnt exist and doesnt use the notions of real life. So we can deal with Cass Gender even if It is just a Concept.

    Our minds can adapt and change, so the gender game in real life can adapt and change to fit the multiple concepts our mind can handle.

    The first thing It comes to mind is that characters are not persons but fantasies. They are not persons but in a certain sense they are real

  3. gerardo tejada says:

    I dont speak english the text above was generated by me using nothing more than google to check words and spell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s